Stop Sending Ducks to Eagle School: A Leadership Lesson I’ve Learned Through Consulting
Leaders often spend too much time trying to change people instead of understanding them.
One analogy that has stayed with me over the years is this: Don’t send your ducks to eagle school.
At first, it sounds amusing. But the more organizations I work with, the more I realize how true it is.
Think about it.
Ducks are exceptional at what they were designed to do. They work well in groups, adapt to different environments, and thrive through consistency and teamwork. Eagles, on the other hand, are known for their vision, independence, and ability to soar above the rest. Both are remarkable—but for entirely different reasons.
The problem begins when leaders expect every duck to become an eagle.
I’ve seen organizations hire someone because of their attention to detail, discipline, and ability to execute processes exceptionally well. Then, a few years later, that same employee is promoted into a highly strategic leadership role that demands innovation, vision, and constant decision-making—skills that may not align with their natural strengths.
I’ve also seen creative, visionary employees placed into highly structured roles that require repetitive administrative work and rigid processes. Eventually, they lose motivation, become disengaged, and start questioning themselves.
The immediate reaction is usually to assume there’s a performance problem.
But often, it isn’t.
It’s a placement problem.
One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned through consulting is that performance is deeply connected to alignment. Whether I’m helping organizations improve their people, strengthen their operations, reposition their brand, or transform their business, success almost always begins by putting the right people in the right roles.
This doesn’t mean people shouldn’t learn, grow, or develop new competencies. Growth is an essential part of leadership and career progression. However, meaningful development should strengthen who people already are—not force them to become someone they’re not.
As consultants and leaders, our responsibility isn’t simply to fill vacancies or create organizational charts. Our responsibility is to understand people.
That starts with asking better questions.
What naturally energizes this person?
Where do they consistently perform at their best?
What type of work gives them confidence instead of anxiety?
How do they contribute most effectively to the team?
These are questions every leader should ask before assigning responsibilities or promoting employees.
Unfortunately, many organizations still reward tenure over readiness or technical expertise over leadership capability. Promotions become rewards rather than strategic decisions. The result is predictable: capable employees are placed in roles that don’t fit them, leaders become frustrated, and organizations lose productivity.
One of the first things I assess during a consulting engagement is whether people are sitting in the right seats. Surprisingly, improving organizational performance doesn’t always require hiring new people. Sometimes, it simply requires repositioning the talented people you already have.
I’ve witnessed remarkable transformations when organizations stopped trying to “fix” employees and instead started maximizing their strengths. Teams became more engaged. Managers became more confident. Collaboration improved. Productivity increased—not because people changed, but because their environment finally allowed them to succeed.
Leadership isn’t about creating a workforce where everyone thinks, works, and leads the same way.
It’s about building teams with complementary strengths.
Some people are natural executors.
Some are innovators.
Some build relationships.
Some solve complex problems.
Some inspire people.
Some create systems.
Every one of them has value.
The challenge for leaders is recognizing those differences and creating opportunities where each person can contribute at their highest potential.
Looking back on the organizations I’ve worked with, I can honestly say this:
The best leaders weren’t the ones who tried to change people.
They were the ones who understood people.
Because when you stop sending ducks to eagle school, both ducks and eagles finally have the opportunity to thrive.
And perhaps that’s what great leadership has always been about—not changing people, but positioning them where they can become the very best version of themselves.
Maurice S. Librea
Management Consultant | Human Capital | Business Transformation | Marketing & Business Development
Comments
Post a Comment